Home

Centre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO

CCBIO Seminar

CCBIO Seminar: Norman J. Maitland

Welcome to CCBIO Seminar with speaker Norman J. Maitland from the YCR Cancer Research Unit, Department of Biology, University of York, UK.

ccbio_seminars_logo2017.jpg

CCBIO seminars logo, background people in a seminar room and a lecturer in front.
Photo:
Colourbox/CCBIO collage

Apart from the interesting talks, the CCBIO seminars are a good way to meet CCBIO members and associates. Please feel free to inform others about this seminar as all are welcome both to the lecture and the pizza get-together afterwards.

Invited speaker: Norman J. Maitland, Director of the YCR Cancer Research Unit, Department of Biology, University of York, UK.

Time: January 26th 2017 at 14:30, Auditorium 4, BBB

Host: Karl-Henning Kalland

Title: Modelling of cell fate and differentiation using tissue-derived human prostate epithelial cells

Abstract:

"Essentially, all models are wrong, but some are useful" *:

Modelling of cell fate and differentiation using tissue-derived human prostate epithelial cells

Professor Norman J. Maitland, University of York, Director YCR Cancer Research Unit, York

My laboratory uses primary cells of epithelial and stromal lineages disaggregated from human tissues to reconstruct cell: cell interactions in the human prostate (and prostate cancers).  At the core of these studies was a desire to understand the change in the proportion of cell types from an equal mixture of basal and luminal cells in normal prostate acini,  to a population of cancer cells composed of >99% luminal cells.  Whereas cell mass in normal and benign (BPH) prostate tissues is driven by replicating basal cells, cancers consist largely of replicating luminal cells. In many tissues, most notably skin and colon, the mouse provides an excellent system for cell fate tracking, as a model for human tissues.  Unfortunately, the mouse prostate is quite different from the human equivalent in both structure and function, and there are relatively few existing cell line models available for human prostate. 

Using freshly disaggregated biopsy material, we were able to enrich for sub-populations, using multiple cell surface markers and differential cell adhesion properties (Collins AT et al, Cancer Research, 2005).  Reconstitution of cell types in 3D could regenerate PSA-expressing polarised acini from basal precursor cells.  Unlike most contemporary studies, we produced detailed gene expression profiles using the enriched subpopulations, rather than phenotyping heterogeneous cell mixtures from large tissue biopsies.  We also identified, for the first time, highly clonogenic stem-like (SC) populations from both normal and malignant tissues. Cancers were distinguished by a strongly pro-inflammatory phenotype (Birnie R et al, Genome Biology, 2008).   

Given the distinct cell populations in benign and cancer tissues, we have attempted to resolve the control mechanisms, which drive cellular differentiation in prostate epithelium. 

We have tracked cell fates using 3 independent techniques.  Firstly using lentiviral transduction of the SC with a differentiation-sensitive fluorescent marker, we determined that luminal cells derived from a basal precursor.  Secondly, by measuring telomere length and telomerase activity we showed that the simple linear relationship from SC to differentiated cells in normal epithelium was changed in benign prostatic hyperplasias (BPH in Rane JK et al, Eur Urol, 2016) and finally we exploited the heterozygous state of the characteristic TMPRSS2-ERG fusion to identify for the first time allelic preferences in TMPRSS2 expression (Polson ES et al, Nature Communications 2012). A novel co-expression analysis monitored genes whose expression was linked not only in prostate but other human tissues to identify 4 distinct, non-overlapping gene families (Rane JK et al, Stem Cell Reports, 2014). 

Our most recent studies have focussed on diffusible factors, e.g. cytokine signalling, where both pro- and anti-inflammatory molecules provided by autocrine and paracrine interactions, were exploited by cancer stem-like cells to establish distal metastases, in the absence of effects on tumour cell growth.  However, few previous and contemporary studies take account of differentiation, focusing instead on mutation profiles.  A true combination therapy would seek to eliminate not only the replicating luminal cells, but also the underlying, largely quiescent cancer stem-like cells.

*(George Box, 1987 in Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces, John Wiley & Sons.)