Journal of Arabic and Islamic

Studies

CONTENTS

Volume VII, 2007

Edited by Alex Metcalfe with  Joseph Norment Bell

UNICODE HTML FILES

We have now uploaded most of our HTML files in Unicode. Unicode HTML files will replace the pre-publication  PDF files when they are published on paper. The printed articles may differ slightly from the pre-publication files, but changes in pagination will normally not be allowed. HTML files are provided since all diacritics can be searched in them. Because of the continuing development of standards these are always in tentative form. The page numbers of the PDF file are given in black brackets in the HTML text. Underlined words before a page number are divided between pages in the PDF/printed version. In case of discrepancies, the printed version should be cited.

All our HTML files require Unicode compliant systems. Our older HTML files, requiring installation of the JAIS TTW font, have been deleted.

Zoltan Szombathy. Freedom of Expression and Censorship in Medieval Arabic Literature. (Adobe Acrobat 5.x PDF file, 262 kB, pp. 1-24). HTML Unicode version.

Abstract: This article explores the restraints placed upon literary production in medieval Arabic literature (particularly poetry) and the ways in which such control was effected. After surveying the various ways of controlling the production of texts, which ranged from mild self-censorship to the actual execution of authors by state authorities, we will try to find general patterns in the data, with a special emphasis on the different treatment of lèse-religion and lèse-majesté respectively.

Stephan Guth. Individuality Lost, Fun Gained: Some Recurrent Motifs in Late Twentieth-Century Arabic and Turkish Novels. (Adobe Acrobat 5.x PDF file, 283 kB, pp. 24-49). HTML Unicode version to be posted later.

Abstract: Starting from an alternative description, based mainly on German literature, of what has come to be called 'postmodernism', the present study reexamines Arabic and Turkish novels from the 1980s and 1990s in the light of this description. It is argued that the descriptive categories developed on the basis of European texts also make sense for texts from the Middle East and North Africa, suggesting that the way life is perceived in these regions at the end of the twentieth century does not differ fundamentally from how it is experienced in a Western country -- there is a global discursive com­munity with similar outlooks on life on both sides, rather than a 'clash of civilizations'. The alternative description also assigns many 'postmodern' features their place in a 'structure of meaning', which sheds some new light on the inner architecture of the period in question and on the function of the parts in a complementary whole.

Ahmad Atif Ahmad. Al-Ghazali's Contributions to the Sunni Juristic Discourses on Apostasy. (Adobe Acrobat 5.x PDF file, 243 kB, pp. 50-73). HTML Unicode version to be posted later.

Abstract: The significance of al-Ghazālī (d. 1111) in Islamic intellectual history can­not be disputed, but his influence on the Sunnī juristic discourse on apostasy may be exaggerated. Ghazālī’s contribution to the Sunnī juristic discourse on apostasy includes a trilogy: first, an attack on the philosophers known as Tahāfut al-falāsifa (The Incoherence of the Philosophers) in which he accuses them of unbelief if they believe in the eternity of the world or God’s ignorance of the particular events of the world or deny bodily resurrection in the world to come. Second, is an attack on his con­temporary Ismāʿīlīs in his Faḍāʾiḥ al-bāṭiniyya (The scandals of the eso­teric factions), where he holds their leaders to be infidels in addition to being a source of sedition. Third, comes an attempt at providing a conceptual distinction between doctrinal heresy and apostasy, while equating the concept of zandaqa with apostasy in his Fayṣal al-tafriqa bayn al-islām wa-l-zandaqa (The distinction between Islam and zandaqa/unbelief). The Sunnī juristic discourse on apostasy was neither influenced by Ghazālī’s attempt to provide a decisive conceptual distinction between apostasy and doctrinal heresy nor by his equating of zandaqa and apostasy. Sunnī jurists referred to examples of apostasy that Ghazālī provided but did not seem to agree with his ambition of resolving the question of apostasy and distin­guishing it from heresy once and for all, which left deciding who is an apostate in specific cases a matter of judicial discretion.

Abdessatar Mahfoudhi. The Place of the Etymon and the Phonetic Matrix in the Arabic Mental Lexicon. (Adobe Acrobat 5.x PDF file, 347 kB, pp. 74-102). HTML Unicode version to be posted later.

Abstract: Two units have traditionally been proposed as the basis of the organization of the Arabic lexicon: the root and the stem. The root approach, the most common, is basʃed on the root and pattern theory of Arabic morphology (e.g., McCarthy 1981), which contends that derivation is based on the interleaving of consonantal roots into patterns. By contrast, the stem ap­proach is based on the stem-based theory of Arabic morphology (e.g., Benmamoun 1999) whose main tenet is that the stem is the basis of deri­vation. More recently, Bohas (e.g., 2000) has challenged these two ap­proaches. He proposes that the Arabic lexicon is organized in three layers under three units: the phonetic matrix, the etymon, and the ‘radical’. These three proposals have different implications for the Arabic mental lexicon. This study discusses these theories with a focus on the validity of the no­tions of the etymon and matrix in the Arabic mental lexicon in light of old and new psycholinguistic evidence. Keywords: Arabic morphology, root, pattern, etymon, phonetic matrix, psycholinguistics, lexicon

Ze’ev Maghen. ‘They Shall Not Draw Nigh’: The Access of Unbelievers to Sacred Space in Islamic and Jewish Law (Adobe Acrobat 5.x PDF file, 288 kB, pp. 103-31). HTML Unicode version to be posted later.

Abstract: This essay compares the Sunni Muslim position(s) concerning the ingress of non-Muslims to the Meccan Sanctuary with the Rabbinic outlook on the entry of non-Jews into the Temple precinct. In both cases, the issue is one of purity and pollution, and the algorithms of each religion’s ritual code are therefore probed in search of the underlying bases for their respective policies on the subject. The discussion will follow the legists through their intricate evaluation of what is perceived by many today to be ‘minutiae’ – it was certainly not seen thus by the jurists themselves. The attitudes of Shari’a and Halakha to immersion for the sake of conversion also harbor significant implications for this question, and space is devoted to elucidating the two systems’ variant rationales for requiring this ceremony. Our conclusions reveal a significant difference – indeed, a diametric antithesis – between Judaism’s and Islam’s conceptions of the cultic status of the other.

Last modified June 28, 2008.

Return to JAIS Home Page

ʃ