Title: PhD Candidate
Phone: +47 55 58 91 60
Cellphone: +47 911 32 802 SMS
E-mail: Gisle.Andersen@sos.uib.no
Visiting address: Rosenbergsgaten 39
Room number: 301
- Sociology of knowledge
- Political sociology
- Environmental Sociology
- relationship between knowledge production and the articulation of values embedded in political actions and environmental regulation.
2012
Andersen, Gisle og Mangset, Marte (2012). Er forestillingen om det egalitære Norge resultatet av en målefeil? - Om falske og ekte motsetninger mellom sosiologiske analyser av klasse og kultur. (Is the perception of Norway as an egalitarian country the result of a measurement error? Fake and real contradictions between sociological analyses of class and culture) Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning, 2012(2), 158-188.
2007
Maten som er trygg nok. En studie av legitimeringsarbeid i stortingsdebatter.
Hovedfag(Master Thesis), Universitetet i Bergen.
2005
Lise Granlund og Gisle Andersen
Samfunnsvitenskapelige tenkemåter: Et hjelpehefte
Oslo, Universitetsforlaget.
The project explores the process of defining an environmental problem, how and by whom relevant scientific knowledge is defined and how this knowledge is used in Norwegian parliamentary debates. The objective is both to disentangle how processes of knowledge production and transformation are correlated with the formation of legitimate political alternatives and to map the valuations used by political actors arguing for specific political alternatives. Thus, the project aims to provide new empirical and theoretical knowledge on the relation between knowledge production and the articulation of values that is embedded in political actions and environmental regulation.
The main case study is scientific and political processes related to the on-going development of an environmental management plan for the Barents Sea and the sea areas off the Lofoten islands.
Data are; a) verbatim reports from the Norwegian parliamentary debates on environmental problems related to cases (1970 – 2010) b) scientific and policy documents and c) interviews with natural scientists involved in the on-going work on the environmental management plan.