|
Project outline
Poverty politics: current approaches to
its production and reduction
Project Leader: Professor Vigdis Broch-Due
Post-Doctoral Researcher: Dr. John-Andrew McNeish
Research Programme (2004-2007)
Concerns about poverty who
is the poor, why they are poor, and what can be deemed a proper
response to them have long been at the core of discourses
about society and its others. This comparative and multi-disciplinary
project is a direct response to current discussions in development
politics and the difficulties experienced in the implementation
of poverty-reducing strategies.
Far from being a straightforward
condition of deprivation and destitution that is easily defined
empirically or unambiguously detected through standardised
indicators and measurement, poverty is a contentious and complex
construct. Poverty is entangled in an archetypal thick discourse,
encapsulating a vast range of social, political and historical
struggles, constantly evolving new values, imagery, social
identities and material outcomes. While a lack of key resources
is at the core of most poverty registers worldwide - what
defines that lack differs widely across societies and over
time. The experience of being poor forged from a multiplicity
of possible lacks and shortcomings ---- material, moral, social
and metaphorical---defined against what constitutes prosperity
and success. Poverty is produced through processes of social
differentiation and shaped by the politics of wealth and power,
both globally and locally. In other words, while the end results
of poverty-producing processes are scarcity, suffering and
social exclusion - poverty is formed within cultural frameworks
and has to be examined in its proper social and historical
context.
The core of this project
is a comparative exploration of the myriad ways in which poverty
is produced in different social, cultural, political and economic
settings. Through historical and ethnographic analysis this
multi-disciplinary research investigates the specific ways
in which global poverty has been constituted as an object
of social knowledge with its specific modes of representation
and social engineering. We focus on the implications of this
for the social identities of the poor and interventions into
their lives by states, NGOs and transnational agencies. We
combine this more basic research agenda with a critical assessment
of the range of policies, strategies and methodologies aimed
at poverty reduction. We seek to build a nuanced and contextualized
picture of the forces that combine to encourage development,
and of the forces that can and do impede poverty reduction.
We study the relationships between elites and poor, between
social capital and social mobilisation, and between culture
and modernity. In order to demonstrate the diversity of the
problem of poverty and the particular difficulties faced by
the process in-depth qualitative research will be conducted
in highly dissimilar countries i.e. Bolivia, Guatemala, Argentina,
Kenya, Uganda, Morocco and India. In particular this project
seeks to follow the challenge set by internationally approved
poverty reduction strategies and to respond directly to the
different critiques of their practice. As such we aim to make
a co-ordinated evaluation of these processes by conducting
comparative research on these strategies local design and
application. We ask whether different political values, structures
of government and local decision-making can contribute alternative
poverty reducing strategies that make significant departures
from the tenets of current development practice?
Principal objectives
The key questions
we aim to explore in this project are:
- How do the relationships between the international
system, state and civil society relate to poverty and
prosperity in different settings?
- What are the constraints and alternatives for reducing
poverty?
- How has our knowledge about poverty changed over time,
and how have these different perceptions influenced policy?
"Poverty Politics"
is funded by a grant from the Research Council of Norway (2004-2007).
At the University of Bergen the project is a significant contribution
to the University's major strategic focus on international
and development-related research as defined in the University's
Strategic Plan 2000-2005 and continued under a new, strengthened
institutionalisation as a university-wide research focus.
The Department of Social Anthropology has played a central
role in the building-up of this research focus through four
decades and maintains a leading position in this regard. The
present project builds on and further develops the department's
global partnerships with universities and other relevant institutions.
The project involves the active participation of masters and
doctoral students.
THE CHANGING CONTOURS OF POVERTY IN SCHOLARLY MODELS AND DEVELOPMENT POLICIES
The global community of multilateral governance is hard at work to re-define their efforts vis-à-vis poverty. All these new strategies, plans, reports and evaluations are to demonstrate a new understanding and commitment on the part of donors to alleviating poverty. If one looks back on certain official documents, issues relating to poverty and welfare have evolved and changed their content and rhetoric through time. The poverty issue was at times invisible or visible, implicit or explicit, in the aid activities and the development discourse. But as we find approach the end of the fourth development decade, several questions about the discourse on poverty -- and, closely related, development -- can and should be raised:
How has the poverty discourse evolved, and how much has changed in descriptions of poverty and the poor in donor policy as well as in the models of social science? How has the concept of poverty been understood and described until now, and is there one understanding or perception of what poverty is and consensus on how it should be tackled? Is there a hegemonic discourse about poverty and, if so, how are structures of power articulated through it? How are alternative voices and dissenting views framed and negotiated? What is the relationship between the poverty knowledge articulated through research and the more official poverty talk and policies designed by national governments and international donors?
The project will these questions through a series of desk-studies of both published literature as well as ‘grey’ material mainly to be undertaken by MA students linked to the project. In organising our data, that is, the discursive evidence, we will examine the poverty discourse through registers of meanings and definitions. The material will be divided into the following broad data clusters: 1) definitions/descriptions of poverty, 2) definitions/descriptions of the poor, 3) policies, plans and practices (or prescriptions of what the issues/problems are, their inherent assumptions, and how to tackle them).
The Poverty Discourse in Development Assistance
The purpose of research is not so much to present one definition of poverty and development. It is rather to illustrate through a historical, discursive analysis how the definition of poverty has been transformed (and perhaps even inflated) throughout the history of development assistance.
The objective of the study is to have a comparative analysis on the discourse of poverty from the mid-1960s to the present and to find shifts in regards to what is spoken about poverty then and now. Through a critical reading of official documentation - primarily the annual OECD/DAC Reviews and the World Bank’s World Development Reports (WDRs) - we will attempt to trace the evolvement of poverty as a concept. We have chosen these two different types of reports precisely because we wanted different types of documentation in order to disaggregate what and how the actors were presenting the problems of development. As such, the WDRs give much more insight and analysis than the DAC Reviews, yet on many levels the DAC Reviews represent the thinking of multiple actors.
We will also examine the workings of bilateral plans to find nuances in how the general category known as the "donors" approach these issues. A review of some of the policies of the Scandinavian donors -- Norway, Sweden and Denmark -- will be undertaken to demonstrate how bilateral donors were reacting to the debate as laid out by the multilateral donors. The purpose here is to investigate how much the discussion as presented by the bilateral donors resembles the arguments of the World Bank and OECD/DAC, or whether there is a different perspective on poverty represented by the "like-minded" countries.
In order to test the reception and various interpretations of the discourse by those targeted, we focus on the development plans created by highly contrasting Latin American, Indian and African governments. It is hoped that this diversity of cases will help the research to come behind the facade, disaggregate the concept of poverty even further and actually deal with the heterogeneity of developing countries,. When compared with donor statements, do we find repetition in the presentation of the problems, the methods for presenting the problems, the same understanding of what the problem is? Is there a parroting or repetition of slogans, in the same way that one copies fashion designers? Or is there a difference depending upon whether the focus is on donor or recipient viewpoints? We will also look at what happens with poverty more locally by including the study of selected district plans Where appropriate, examples will be taken from their respective national development plans in order to demonstrate and/or counter the claim that there is a world view.
The Poverty Discourse In Social Science
The poverty research industry has played an important role in delivering models, measurements and theoretical justification for poverty politics both international as well as on the various domestic arenas. Yet the institutional/professional memory amongst social scientists tends to be as shallow as that of development agencies.
We urgently need to chronicle and critically review the thinking behind what has historically been very different perceptions of the poverty problem. There has been a transformation in the study of poverty from the more reform-mined inquiry into the political economy of industrial capitalism, (like the ones of Eilert Sundt, Torsten Veblen, Gunnar Myrdahl to mention some of ‘the natives’), - to the highly controversial “culture of poverty” notion of Oscar Lewis (1965)- and to the detached and very technical analysis of the present focus on income, demography and nutrition and finally capacity. In short, poverty knowledge has been produced through very different models, spanning psychosomatic profiles, social surveys, ethnography and statistical aggregations and so on.
The major tension in poverty research over time has been between approaches addressing structural inequality against those focusing more on altering individual and/or group behaviour. Our study of past and present approaches to poverty will also explore the wider context - the politics, institutions, ideologies and social science that shaped poverty research and influenced policy.
..............................................................................................................................................................................................
Research
India
Vigdis
Broch Due. Project Leader.
The regional state of Kerala, India provides
a unique setting for exploring both the complexity of factors
embedded in poverty-producing processes, and the impact of
poverty reducing polices on very different groups of poor
peoples (the so-called “scheduled casts”, “tribals”
and the “impure”). Not only does this heterogeneous
category labelled “the poor” contain groups with
radically different socio-cultural profiles in terms of ethnicity,
class, religion, kinship, gender and property-rights regimes,
it also embrace very complex livelihood systems. The natural
environment is at the interface between the land and the sea,
where a wide array of ecosystems of terrestrial, inter tidal,
riverine and marine origin meet and interact. To survive,
poor peoples draw on a diversity of activities work such as
fishing, fuelwood collection, farming, animal husbandry and
petty trading. This complexity increases greatly at the household
level where members typically engage in different income-generating
activities. Moreover, much of the poverty in Kerela is “interstitial”
- pockets of poverty hidden amidst the development and relative
wealth that is often found in coastal areas in India.
All these factors combined
create a particularly interesting mix of the dynamic relations
between poverty and prosperity, but also produce a particularly
complex policy environment for those attempting to address
regional poverty. While policy responses to poverty typically
depend on simplification and streamlining, one would expect
that the complexity embedded in the Kerela poor greatly complicates
policy planning and increases the chance for unintended outcomes.
Thus the case of Kerela is particularly suited to study in
more detail the widespread challenge to policy-making of designing
measures that can adequately address the diverse situation
of poor peoples.
In short, Kerela has been chosen
as a case-study because of its particular history and record
in poverty reduction. In Kerala local politics and culture
have been combined to form a distinctive brand of participatory
local democracy and development planning. Along with the state
of West Bengal and Porto Alegre in Brazil, Kerala has been
hailed by the international research community as one of the
great alternative success stories of recent local development
(Fung & Olin Wright 2003). We ask whether the example
of Kerala can really suggest an alternative basis for poverty
reduction? Are there good practices in Kerala that are generalisable?
Furthermore, it will study how poverty reduction in Kerala
has been achieved through a combination of cultural and political
values?
Kristina Jones. Masters
Student.
Thesis submitted in June 2006.
For abstract, see here
Stian Krog.
Masters Student.
Thesis submitted in June 2007.
For abstract, see here
Ingrid Jæger. MPhil
Graduate
Thesis submitted in June 2007.
For abstract, see here
Joakim Ophaug.
Master student
Dalits on the edge
of globalized economy: The implications of economic globalization
on access to public spaces.
The
project focuses on the social and economic situation of lower-caste “Dalit” groups
in the southern Indian state of Karnataka, especially in
the southern parts
of Bangalore district, where both western and Indian IT-companies
have established themselves as substantial employers in the
last decade, and which is growing by the numbers every day.
Dalits have traditionally been locked into different forms
of
manual labour, even bonded labour,
but as reservations
and legislation has provided these groups with higher education,
it is only natural that Dalits would become labourers alongside
other employers in the different IT-companies that seek new
labour for their new departments in the Bangalore district.
This year alone Apple Computers will employ 3000 persons
for their new call enter located in the EcoSpace business
area just south of Bangalore. But to what extent do these
companies employ Dalits, and what implications does caste
have on their “western” business structure?
Through my fieldwork among Dalits and hopefully among business
coordinators at IT-companies in this region, I wish to highlight
how economic globalization is affecting the social and economic
situation of Dalits, how western companies think about caste
entering their egalitarian business structure, and to what
extent the possible economic improved situation of Dalits
has on the general access to public space.
V.Dinesan.
PhD Student (Also connected to the Challenging
the State Programme)
Presently working on the theme
“Caste/class, Spatiality and Teyyam: Towards Understanding
Cosmologies of North Malabar, (Kerala) South-West India”.
His research interests are directly related to the department’s
ongoing research on “Challenging the State”. However,
some of the issues he raises have overlaps with the present
major research on “Poverty Politics”.
Hanne
Elisabeth Wanvik Johansen.
Masters Student.
The
focus of the thesis is the health situation among an indigenous
group in South India. More specific I am concerned with the
medical pluralism consisting of various biomedical options,
and what can be called “indigenous” medicine.
During my fieldwork I was puzzled by the apparently disordered
variations of acceptance, scepticism and resistance that flourish
among the particular group of medical and health care consumers.
In my thesis I will try to shed some light on the choices
and the situations in which people have to make them. I am
also working on the historical angle of the contemporary situation.I
have also found an interest in the topics of power and suppression.
I will explore whether there are certain elements of the biomedical
systems that can be seen as part of a structural violence.
In relevance here is the whole situation of being “tribals”,
poor, and having limited access to education, health care,
work etc. The medical situation will be viewed in light of
theories of social suffering, suppression etc.
Sri Lanka
Berit Angelskar. MPhil
Graduate.
Thesis submitted in June 2006.
For abstract, see here
Guatemala & Bolivia
John-Andrew McNeish.
Post-Doctoral Researcher.
Overcoming Invisibility
in a Global Age: Encountering Development and Prosperity in
Bolivia and Guatemala.
Although
with very different social histories and locations, Bolivia
and Guatemala have
been linked together both by modern
discourses on poverty and multi-culturalism, but also by
the expansion of recent
efforts to create free trade agreements in Central (CAFTA)
and South America (ALCA) aimed at assisting the resolution
of these and related problems. As a result of these discourses
and actions, the particularities of the cultures and histories
of the two countries have been subsumed by a transnational
system of development and economic liberalism. Indeed, despite
the striking differences and complexity of both countries
social structures, both Bolivians and Guatemalans use similar
means to contest this system of development and economic
liberalism.
Both countries have been witness to a rising number of
legal and extra-legal efforts to express dissatisfaction
and rejection
of the current global system: high levels of militant activism,
democratic instability and mass demonstrations, as well as
land invasions, vigilante actions and rising levels of civil
violence. These coincidences of impact and reaction strike
me as worthy of further research. In this study I aim to
explore
the current context of response to development and economic
liberalism in Bolivia and Guatemala. Moreover, they raise
a series of important questions:
Why is there a coincidence
in terms of the methods used to express opposition to, or
dissatisfaction with current policies for development and
economic liberalisation? Are there common conditions that
constrain social action? What role do states, international
organisations and recent efforts at democratic reform play
in this? What do these actions tell us about the limitations
of, but also the advantages to be gained in contesting, the
current international system and its policies? How do differing
social groups and populations express their different identities
and demands through these methods? What does all of this tell
us about competing, but also the meeting, of contrasting notions
of public and private, of tradition and modernity, and most
importantly poverty and prosperity?
Guatemala
Margit Ystanes. PhD
Student
The
project aims to explore ethnographically the contested views
of the Mirador Basin Project, the largest
archaeological-environmental conservation project in Guatemala.
This project is driven by governmental and international
business interests, and is challenged by local populations
who are losing access to logging and agricultural concessions
due to the projects efforts to conserve the rainforest for
tourist purposes. The focus is to explore the positions of
both local communities opposing the project and the elites
behind it, using both discourse theory and more experience
sensitive approaches, and dealing with matters such as landscape
and belonging, conceptions of sustainable development, national
integration and the relationship between global process and
local context. Main questions asked in this research project
focus on how local communities frame their arguments for
continued use of the rain forest. Have they become a people
caught largely “betwixt and between” the different
templates employed in this contestation regarding sustainable
development, and preservation of culture vs preservation
of relics of ancient culture? How do local people view themselves
in this regard, and to what extent does the Mirador Project
challenge their livelihoods and understandings of their natural
surroundings? Furthermore, how are the local communities
opposing the project perceived and portrayed in the discourses
of economic development, ecological preservation and cultural
heritage by the corporate, academic and political interests
behind the project? What impact does the unequal distribution
of power and legitimacy have in the controversy related to
the project? Can the communities' continued resistance to
the Mirador Project be understood as local resistance to
national integration and a denial of the legitimacy of the
Guatemalan nation state?
Venezuela
Iselin Åsedotter Strønen.
MPhil Graduate.
Thesis submitted in June 2006.
For abstract, see here
Brazil
Heidi
Larsen. Masters Student.
 Thesis submitted in October 2007.
For abstract, see here
Peru
Lena Oppland.
Masters Student.
In this project I research the dynamic between
different forms of knowledge and systems of knowledge, and
aim to highlight how indigenous people in the High Andes use,
tranfer, reproduce and change their cultural knowledges in
relation to national and local social processes. I ask how
the relationahip between different forms of knowledge about
the world creates meaning, power and the construction of ethnic
identities. In this way I also mean to study the relationship
between indigenous peoples and the State. I aim to further
study the process in which knowledge is produced in people's
relationships to the complex of ideas represented at the local,
national and international. What are the differences between
these kinds of knowledges? How do Quechua speaking peoples
use their "traditional" cosmological knowledge to
understand their everyday? How is their worldview transformed
or changed through their meeting with hegemonic national and
global knowledges?
Kenya
Leah Junge.
MPhil Student
Key
Words: Household economy, household relations, micro-
credit, village banking (FSA), saving culture, gender
relations, poverty, social change, development, education,
security, self- esteem, status, independence, insurance,
front/backstage.
This study, conducted among members of rural communities
within Embu and Mbere districts respectively is aimed at
assessing the interrelational play between a Christian Micro
Finance NGO and the local community members involved as clients.
Fascinating in this study is the dynamic play between both
`the local' (community members) and
`the foreign' (NGO), and how they negotiate
their spaces in relation to each other. Front and backstage
theatrics are taken into account in this play of development
under the financial umbrella of rural finance. Understandably
there are always reactions and effects to new interventions
in any given rural community, this thesis examines household
economic changes both positive and negative as well as the
social and cultural metamorphoses emerging from this type
of financial intervention, ( Micro- credit and FSA).
It also examines the `before' and `after' arenas after rural
finance intervention.
Thor Erik Sortland.
Masters student
Conflict and Displacement in Northern Kenya
Keywords: Pastoralism, Kenya, Samburu, Conflict, Displacement
The focus of this thesis will be on how a case of conflict and displacement in Northern Kenya has affected a group of people in social, economic and religious ways. This involves not only how social networks, livelihood praxis and other socioeconomic aspects are broken down and disarticulated, but also how new one’s are rebuilt, reformed and adapted into a new social and geographical context. During my fieldwork I found that rituals are changing in content, context and importance. I found that there is a renegotiation of the social stratification and new statuses are being built particularly as a result of the increased centralisation due to insecurity.
The most important parts involved in this conflict are from the two pastoralist ethnic groups Samburu and Pokot. In order to narrow down the scope I have focused on one of the ethnic groups called Samburu. The conflict is very much about the availability of land, and the contesting views on how and by whom landscape should be utilised. For this reasons the conflict involves people, groups and organisations on many various levels from pastoralists and farmers to NGOs and influential politicians. It is interesting to see how processes at policymaking level, international and national, plays out locally. Landscape will be an important category as it rooms so many significant aspects revolving around both this conflict and the cosmological world of the Samburu. For example the political landscape going from community leaders and the council of elders to ambitious MPs and Government Officials. In the cosmological world of the Samburu the importance of grass and water is not only explained by their nomadic wanderings in search for this, but it can be seen symbolically in rituals and blessings as well. The current problems concerning land and the pastoralist livelihood is engraved by the colonial and postcolonial history in Kenya. This can be understood as a history of marginalisation and misunderstandings. Internal conflict and internal displacement is becoming an increasing problem in large parts of Africa and the world at large. I would like to see my thesis as a case study on vast anthropological issues like displacement, postcolonial problems and marginalisation of pastoralists.
Malawi
Jessica Mzamu.
PhD Student.
In this project I aim to problematise standardised
concepts such as “Poverty”, “the Poor”
and “Food Security” in a deconstructive manner
through their use in policy design and implementation in relation
to local Malawian’s conceptualisation of such words.
In exploring the inter - linkages of such concepts within
a wider range of social, political, economic, cultural, natural,
historical as well as global dimensions, I aim to seek ethnographic
insights which might be overlooked by social scientist or
policy makers, yet might be fundamental for such processes
in the case of Malawi. Thus, in trying to answer the broad
research question: “Can the “Poor” influence
Policy?” I will try to explore how poverty discourses
which filter through policy implementation maintain paradigms
of power and subjectivity among certain groups of people.
Return to top
|