- E-postAndrea.Saltelli@uib.no
- BesøksadresseParkveien 9
- PostadressePostboks 78055020 BERGEN
Andrea Saltelli har jobba innanfor fysikalsk kjemi, miljøvitskap, bruksretta statistikk, impact assessment og science for policy. Eitt av dei akademiske fokusområdene hans er sensitivitetsanalyse av modelldata; eit fagfelt der statistiske verktøy blir brukt til å tolke data frå matematiske eller databaserte modellar, og sensitivity auditing; ei utviding av sensitivitetsanalyse som dekkar heile prosessen med å generere kunnskap til bruk i politiske avgjerdsler. Det hittil siste arbeidet hans er eit bidrag til boka Science on the Verge, som handlar om den veksande krisa i kvalitetssikringssystemet til vitskapen. Han er per i dag gjesteforskar ved SVT og ved Open Evidence Research, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC) i Barcelona.
Følg Saltelli på Twitter eller The Conversation.
Sjå Saltelli sine førelesingar og presentasjonar her.
Andrea Saltelli på ORCID
Andrea Saltelli på Google Scholar
- 2020. The technique is never neutral. How methodological choices condition the generation of narratives for sustainability. Environmental Science and Policy. 87-98.
- 2020. Technoscience, policy and the new media. Nexus or vortex? Futures : The journal of policy, planning and futures studies. 8 sider.
- 2020. Quantitative Storytelling in the Making of a Composite Indicator. Social Indicators Research.
- 2020. Pandemie post-normali. Perché CoViD-19 richiede un nuovo approccio alla scienza. Recenti Progressi in Medicina. 202-204.
- 2020. Five ways to ensure that models serve society: a manifesto, . Nature. 482-484.
- 2020. Ethics of quantification: illumination, obfuscation and performative legitimation. Palgrave Communications.
- 2020. Ethics of quantification or quantification of ethics? Futures : The journal of policy, planning and futures studies. 11 sider.
- 2020. Current models underestimate future irrigated areas. Geophysical Research Letters.
- 2020. A sensitivity analysis of the PAWN sensitivity index. Environmental Modelling & Software.
- 2019. Why so many published sensitivity analyses are false: A systematic review of sensitivity analysis practices. Environmental Modelling & Software. 29-39.
- 2019. Silver as a Constraint for a Large-Scale Development of Solar Photovoltaics? Scenario-Making to the Year 2050 Supported by Expert Engagement and Global Sensitivity Analysis. Frontiers in Energy Research.
- 2019. A short comment on statistical versus mathematical modelling. Nature Communications.
- 2018. Why science’s crisis should not become a political battling ground. Futures : The journal of policy, planning and futures studies. 85-90.
- 2017. What is wrong with evidence based policy, and how can it be improved? Futures : The journal of policy, planning and futures studies. 62-71.
- 2017. What is science’s crisis really about? Futures : The journal of policy, planning and futures studies. 5-11.
- 2017. Statistics at the time of the crisis [Statistiche al tempo della crisi]. Epidemiologia & Prevenzione. 165-169.
- 2017. Problematic Quantifications: a Critical Appraisal of Scenario Making for a Global ‘Sustainable’ Food Production. Food ethics. 173-179.
- 2017. Post-normal institutional identities: Quality assurance, reflexivity and ethos of care. Futures : The journal of policy, planning and futures studies. 53-61.
- 2017. Do PISA data justify PISA-based education policy? International Journal of Comparative Education and Development. 20-34.
- 2019. Smettiamola di fingere: quantificare non è un’operazione neutrale (Stop pretending: quantification is never neutral). Epidemiologia & Prevenzione. 121-123.
- 2018. Cargo-cult statistics and scientific crisis. Significance.
- 2020. Post-normal pandemics: Why COVID-19 requires a new approach to science. Blog of ESRC STEPS (Social, Technological and Environmental Pathways to Sustainability) Centre.
- 2018. Fixing statistics is more than a technical issue. Nature. 281-281.
- 2017. Introduction to Sensitivity Analysis. 20 sider.
- 2019. Views from a continent in flux. Nature asked nine leading Europeans to pick their top priority for science at this pivotal point. Love, money, and trust got most votes. Nature. 481-484.
