Foto:
Eivind Senneset, UiB
- E-postBenedicte.Carlsen@uib.no
- Telefon+47 55 58 28 29+47 952 49 887
- BesøksadresseMuséplassen 15007 Bergen
- PostadressePostboks 78005020 Bergen
Vitenskapelig artikkel
- (2023). Governance determinants of health: exploring the structural impact of politicalization, bureaucratization and medical standardization on health inequity. International Journal of Health Governance.
- (2022). Using qualitative research to develop an elaboration of the TIDieR checklist for interventions to enhance vaccination communication: short report. Health Research Policy and Systems. 1-8.
- (2021). Nordmenn stolte på myndighetenes informasjon og tiltak i starten av koronapandemien. Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning. 1-16.
- (2020). Why physicians are lousy gatekeepers: Sicklisting decisions when patients have private information on symptoms. Health Economics. 778-789.
- (2019). When “Normal” Becomes Normative: A Case Study of Researchers’ Quotation Errors When Referring to a Focus Group Sample Size Study. International Journal of Qualitative Methods (IJQM). 1-6.
- (2018). Could information about herd immunity help us achieve herd immunity? Evidence from a population representative survey experiment. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health. 854-858.
- (2018). Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 5: how to assess adequacy of data. Implementation Science. 8 sider.
- (2018). Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 4: how to assess coherence. Implementation Science. 9 sider.
- (2018). Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 3: how to assess methodological limitations. Implementation Science. 8 sider.
- (2018). Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 2: how to make an overall CERQual assessment of confidence and create a Summary of Qualitative Findings table. Implementation Science. 13 sider.
- (2018). Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings–paper 6: how to assess relevance of the data. Implementation Science. 11 sider.
- (2018). Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings: introduction to the series. Implementation Science. 10 sider.
- (2017). ”If it weren´t for me…”: Perspectives of family carers of older people receiving professional care. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences. 213-221.
- (2017). Fear of the Fear of the Flu: Assumptions About Media Effects in the 2009 Pandemic. Science communication. 358-381.
- (2016). The swine flu vaccine, public attitudes, and researcher interpretations: a systematic review of qualitative research. BMC Health Services Research. 15 sider.
- (2016). High stakes : an interview study of researchers' motivations for and experiences of being interviewed by journalists. Nordicom Review. 85-99.
- (2015). Using Qualitative Evidence in Decision Making for Health and Social Interventions: An Approach to Assess Confidence in Findings from Qualitative Evidence Syntheses (GRADE-CERQual). PLoS Medicine. 18 sider.
- (2014). Qualitative research synthesis: How the whole can be greater than the sum of its parts. Anthropology in Action. 23-30.
- (2014). Forskning i media: Forskere om motivasjon og erfaringer fra medieintervjuer. Norsk Medietidsskrift. 188-208.
- (2013). Recommended content of referral letters from general practitioners to specialised mental health care: a qualitative multi-perspective study. BMC Health Services Research. 7 sider.
- (2013). Nielsen, Ann; Carlsen, Benedicte; Kjellberg, Pia K. (2013) Positive attitudes towards priority setting in clinical guidelines among Danish general practitioners: A web based survey. Health (Irvine, Calif.). 188-192.
- (2013). Fastlegenes dilemma: Pasientvelferd eller kostnadshensyn. Nytt Norsk Tidsskrift. 349-358.
- (2013). "Når pengene rår, forsvinner andre verdier i systemet”: Helsearbeideres syn på den norske samhandlingsreformen [Health care workers’ view on the Norwegian Coordination Reform]. Nordiske organisasjonsstudier. 29-54.
- (2012). When you can't have the cake and eat it too. A study of medical doctors' priorities in complex choice situations. Social Science and Medicine. 1964-1973.
- (2012). Scanning for satisfaction or digging for dismay? Comparing findings from a postal survey with those from a focus group-study. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 8 sider.
- (2012). General practitioners' experiences with sickness certification: a comparison of survey data from Sweden and Norway. BMC Family Practice. 8 sider.
- (2012). From absence to absenteeism? A qualitative cross case study of teachers' views on sickness absence. The Journal of Socio-Economics (JSE). 129-136.
- (2011). What about N? A methodological study of sample-size reporting in focus group studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology.
- (2011). Psychiatry out-of-hours: a focus group study of GPs' experiences in Norwegian casualty clinics. BMC Health Services Research. 132.
- (2011). Attitudes to clinical guidelines - do GPs differ from other medical doctors? BMJ Quality and Safety. 158-162.
- (2010). The last frontier? Autonomy, uncertainty and standardisation in general practice. Health Sociology Review. 260-272.
- (2010). Guidelines; from foe to friend? Comparative interviews with GPs in Norway and Denmark. BMC Health Services Research.
- (2008). Variation in practice: A questionnaire survey of how congruence in attitudes between doctors and patients influences referral decisions. Medical decision making. 262-268.
- (2008). Dobbeltmoralens voktere? Intervjuer med fastleger om sykemelding. Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning. 259-275.
- (2008). "What lies beneath it all?" - an interview study of GPs' attitudes to the use of guidelines. BMC Health Services Research.
- (2006). Patient involvement in clinical decision making: the effect of GP attitude on patient satisfaction. Health Expectations.
- (2006). Lay perceptions of evidence-based information - a qualitative evaluation of a website for back pain sufferers. BMC Health Services Research.
- (2005). “Saying no is no easy matter”. A qualitative study of competing concerns in rationing decisions in general practice. BMC Health Services Research. 19 sider.
- (2005). Markedsforholdenes betydning for allmennlegenes praksisutøvelse. Økonomisk forum. 20-28.
- (2005). Markedsforholdene har fortsatt betydning for fastlegenes praksisutøvelse. Økonomisk forum. 7-10.
- (2005). Markedsforholdene har fortsatt betydning for fastlegenes praksisutøvelse. Økonomisk forum. 7-10.
- (2004). Hvordan påvirker fastlegeordningen legens skjønnsmessige<BR/>avgjørelser? Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning. 33-47.
- (2003). Professional Support of Self-Help Groups: A Support Group Project for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Patients. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling. 289-303.
- (2003). Introduction of the Patient-list System in General Practice: Changes in Norwegian Physicians Perception of their Gatekeeper Role. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care. 209-213.
- (2003). Fastlegenes erfaringer med fastlegeordningen. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening. 1322-1324.
Rapport
- (2017). Healer or Gatekeeper? Physicians' Role Conflict When Symptoms Are Non-Verifiable. No. 10735. No. 10735. .
- (2003). Legens doble rolle som advokat og portvakt i Fastlegeordningen Evaluering av fastlegeordningen. 19. 19. .
- (2001). Why not study self-help groups? A perspective on the transactions between self-helpers, health professionals and researchers in health care. 11. 11. .
Faglig foredrag
- (2017). Vitenskapsformidling: Holdninger og handlinger i forbindelse med svineinfluensa-utbruddet i 2009.
- (2015). Hva kjennetegner en god forskningsrådssøknad.
- (2015). Forskeres erfaringer med media.
- (2014). Samhandlingsreformens konsekvenser for eldre: Pasientrettigheter, pårørende og koordinering av tjenester.
Populærvitenskapelig foredrag
- (2013). Samhandling på kryss og tvers.
- (2011). Smitter sykefravær?
Vitenskapelig foredrag
- (2022). The role of general practice in care for young adults with depression who fall out of education and employment.
- (2020). Brukermedvirkning og kvalitativ metode – Hva er forskjellen?
- (2020). Brukermedvirkning i forskning.
- (2019). Enacting Pandemics: How Health Authorities Use the Press and Vice Versa.
- (2018). How to make qualitative research syntheses useful.
- (2018). Beating vaccination hesitancy: A survey experiment from Norway.
- (2016). Equitable healthcare: On the potential impact of politicization, bureaucratization and medical standardization of healthcare distribution on social health inequality.
- (2015). The swine flu vaccine, public attitudes, and researcher interpretations: A systematic review of qualitative research.
- (2015). Samhandlingsreformens konsekvenser for eldre: Pasientrettigheter, pårørende og koordinering av tjenester.
- (2015). Pårørenderollen i eldreomsorgen.
- (2015). On the potential impact of politicization, bureaucratization and medical standardization of healthcare distribution and social health inequality.
- (2015). Fear of fear of the flu: The third person (and other strange effects) in the H1N1 outbreak.
- (2014). Thou shalt versus thou shalt not: A meta-synthesis of GPs’ attitudes to clinical practice guidelines.
- (2014). Mixed methods – Blandede metoder.
- (2014). Forskeres opplevelse av å være i media.
- (2014). Er fastlegen med på å prioritere?
- (2014). Er fastlegen med på å prioritere?
- (2013). The Gate is Open. Primary Care Physicians as Social Security Gatekeepers.
- (2013). Science in Society.
- (2013). Generalisering i kvalitativ forskning.
- (2013). Generaliserbarhet i kvalitativ forskning.
- (2013). Forskere om formidling gjennom media.
- (2012). Introduction: Dilemmas in the doctor’s role: Findings, methods and future challenges.
- (2012). Bør fastlegene være portvakter?
- (2011). Rapportering av kvalitative studier i helsefaglige tidsskrift: Eksemplet N i fokusgruppestudier.
- (2011). Fastlegen som forvalter: Portvakt og døråpner.
- (2011). Attitudes to clinical guidelines - do GPs differ from other medical doctors?
- (2011). A comparative study of Norwegian and Swedish GPs’ experiences with the task of sickness certification.
- (2010). What about N? A systematic review of sample-size reporting in focus-group studies.
- (2010). Sykefravær i den videregående skolen. Hvordan oppleves det av lærerne?
- (2010). Sykefravær blant lærere- Syke og friske skoler.
- (2010). Hva med N? En systematisk oversikt over utvalg i fokusgruppestudier.
- (2010). GPs' views on clinical guidelines.
- (2010). Fastlegenes portvaktrolle.
- (2009). The last frontier? Autonomy, uncertainty and standardisation in general practice.
- (2009). The last frontier? Autonomy, uncertainty and standardisation in general practice.
- (2009). Egenrapporterte data fra leger.
- (2008). Hvorfor følger ikke allmennleger retningslinjer?
- (2008). Hvordan er sammenhengen mellom legens handlingsfrihet og rettferdig fordeling av helsetjenester?
- (2008). Fastlegers sykemeldingspraksis.
- (2008). Fastlegers erfaringer med sykemeldingsrollen.
- (2007). Thou shalt versus thou shalt not. A qualitative meta-synthesis of GPs’ attitudes to clinical practice guidelines.
- (2007). Hvorfor følger ikke legene kliniske retningslinjer? En kvalitativ meta-analyse.
- (2007). Fastlegens forhold til retningslinjer.
- (2006). The changing role of gatekeepers.
- (2006). How should Norwegian policymakers address the ethical and practical challenges of rationing health care resources and ensuring high quality of care?
- (2006). Has sharing information anything to do with sharing decisions?
- (2005). Patient autonomy in clinical decision making: The effect of GP attitude on patient satisfaction.
- (2005). Hvor viktig er pasientautonomi for pasientene?
- (2005). Health and health care in Tanzania, Uganda and Ethiopia.
- (2004). Norwegian general pratitioners experience in rationing decisions.
- (2004). Legers integritet i skjønnsmessige avgjørelser.
- (2004). Legen som portvakt i fastlegeordningen.
- (2003). Legens erfaringer ett år etter.
- (2003). Introduction of the patient-list system in general practice: Changes in Norwegian physicians perception of their gatekeeper role.
- (2003). Introduction of the patient-list system in general practice: Changes in Norwegian physicians perception of their gatekeeper role.
- (2003). Introduction of the patient-list system in general practice: Changes in Norwegian physicians perception of their gatekeeper role.
- (2003). Er legen portvakt i fastlegeordningen?
- (2002). Why not study self-help groups? A perspective on the transactions between self-helpers, health professionals and researchers in health care.
- (2002). Portvakt eller advokat. Evaluering av FLO.
- (2002). Hva skjer med legen som portvakt i Fastlegeordningen?
- (2002). Evaluering av fastlegeordningen: Hva skjer med legen som portvakt?
- (2002). Evaluering av fastlegeordningen.
Leder
- (2014). Optimizing the world's nursing and midwifery roles to meet the Millennium Development Goals for maternal and child health more effectively. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2699-2702.
Leserinnlegg
- (2019). Brukermedvirkning i forskning avkledd. Khrono.no.
- (2013). Hysteriske mannlige stemmer. Bergens Tidende.
- (2009). Vi har tatt utfordringen. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening. 2136-2136.
- (2009). Skal vokte dobbeltmoralen. Aftenposten (morgenutg. : trykt utg.).
Short communication
- (2014). Science Communication. Actions and Reactions on the 2009 Swine Flu Outbreak. Nordicom Information. 85-88.
- (2009). Vi har tatt utfordringen. Tidsskrift for Den norske legeforening. 2136.
- (2009). Legers skjønn og andres skjønn. Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning. 64-65.
Vitenskapelig antologi/Konferanseserie
- (2019). Pandemics, Publics, and Politics - Staging Responses to Public Health Crises. Palgrave Pivot.
Kompendium
- (2009). The Gate is Open: Primary Care Physicians as Social Security Gatekeepers. 07.
Mastergradsoppgave
- (2019). Integrering av kunnskapsbasert praksis i bachelor sykepleierutdanning - en kvalitativ stude.
Populærvitenskapelig artikkel
- (2021). Vil fellesskapsfølelse få flere til å ta koronavaksinen? Dagens medisin.
Kronikk
- (2022). Redelighet er grunnleggende for tillit. Forskningsetikk.
- (2019). Er forskere interesserte å uttale seg i media? Forskning.no.
- (2014). Forskere som formidlere. Aftenposten (morgenutg. : trykt utg.).
- (2013). Stol ikke på all forskning. Fysioterapeuten. 6-7.
- (2013). Dristighet – nytt mantra fra Forskningsrådet. Forskning.no.
- (2011). Stol ikke på all forskning. Aftenposten (morgenutg. : trykt utg.).
- (2010). Hvordan skal vi si nei? Bergens Tidende. 3.
- (2009). Porten er åpen. Dagens næringsliv.
- (2008). Med rett til å psykemelde. Morgenbladet.
- (2000). Kan økonomene gi oss mer helse? Aftenposten (morgenutg. : trykt utg.).
Doktorgradsavhandling
- (2006). The changing role of gatekeepers: Rationing and shared decision-making in primary care.
Intervju
- (2020). Mener at overdekning av koronaviruset kan legge press på myndighetene.
- (2018). Kollektiv ansvarsfølelse økte «ja» til vaksinering.
- (2016). Forskere blir ikke skremt av dårlige erfaringer med medier.
- (2015). Pasienten har for mye makt i norsk helsevesen.
- (2015). Nytt graderingssystem for kunnskapssammendrag.
- (2015). Fåfengt prioritering.
- (2014). Mener pasientene har for mye makt.
- (2014). Forskere er fornøyd med medienes formidling.
- (2013). Sykehjemmene tar belastningen.
- (2013). Sykehjemmene tar belastningen.
- (2013). Hvor viktig er pårørende for eldre pasienter?
- (2011). Mistenkjer sjuke kollegaer.
- (2010). Vil kutte i sykelønna.
- (2010). Tar pasientenes side.
- (2010). Tar pasientenes side.
- (2010). Syketiltak uten effekt.
- (2010). Dagsnytt.
- (2009). Mener legene er blitt for snille.
- (2008). Leger bruker skjønn – sykemelder ulovlig.
- (2008). Frykter at staten kun tenker økonomi.
- (2006). Turboleger skaper dyrere helsevesen.
- (2006). Legene er redde for å si nei.
- (2004). Selvjustis om lister. Intervju.
- (2003). Portvakt eller advokat?
- (2002). Vi forventer mer. Leger redde for å miste klienter.
- (2002). Fastleger livredde for å miste pasienter.
- (2002). Fastlegeordningen gir mer makt til pasientene.
- (2002). Fastlegene bøyer av for pasientene.
- (2002). Bedre legeservice. Fastlegeordningen gjør legene redde for å miste pasienter.
Programdeltagelse
- (2008). Norgesmagasinet. Debatt med Allmennlegeforeningen om sykemelding.
- (2008). Norgesglasset (Om legenes holdninger til sykemelding).
- (2004). Resultater fra evaluering av fastlegeordningen.
- (2004). Feilslått fastlegeordning.
- (2004). Fastlegeordningen.
Vitenskapelig Kapittel/Artikkel/Konferanseartikkel
- (2019). Enacting Pandemics: How Health Authorities Use the Press — And Vice Versa. 16 sider.
- (2018). Styring for kvalitet og likebehandling. Norske legers syn på styringsinstrumentenes betydning. 22 sider.
- (2017). Pandemic Rhetoric and Public Memory. What People (Don’t) Remember from the 2009 Swine Flu. 23 sider.
- (2007). Why are primary care physicians avoiding rationing decisions and what can be done about it? The case of Norway.
Sammendrag/abstract
- (2012). A comparison of Norwegian and Swedish General Practitioners' experiences with sickness certification. European Journal of Public Health. 207-208.
Poster
- (2021). General Practice and the marginalization of young adults with depression who fall out of education and employment: A case study .
- (2013). Professional autonomy versus governmental control:Doctors’ attitutdes to clinical guidelines.
- (2012). A comparison of Norwegian and Swedish GPs’ experiences with sickness certification. �.
- (2010). Guidelines; from foe to friend?
Vitenskapelig oversiktsartikkel/review
- (2021). Healthcare workers’ perceptions and experiences of communicating with people over 50 years of age about vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 1-55.
- (2020). Healthcare workers’ perceptions and experiences of communicating with people over 50 about vaccination: a qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 1-14.
- (2013). Intervention protocol: Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of lay health worker programmes to improve access to maternal and child health: qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
- (2013). Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of lay health worker programmes to improve access to maternal and child health: qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 83 sider.
- (2007). Thou shalt versus thou shalt not: a meta-synthesis of GPs' attitudes to clinical practice guidelines. British Journal of General Practice. 971-978.
Innledning
- (2019). Introduction: Pandemics, Publics, and Politics — Staging Responses to Public Health Crises. 1-9.
Intervju tidsskrift
- (2011). Allmennleger mest usikre på retningslinjer. Dagens medisin.
Developing and implementing the GRADE-CERQual approach: Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research
The GRADE-CERQual approach provides a transparent method for assessing the confidence of evidence from reviews of qualitative research, and indicating this confidence to end users, such as guideline panels or decision makers. CERQual uses a similar approach conceptually to other GRADE tools, but is intended for findings from systematic reviews of qualitative evidence. Carlsen is participating in the GRADE-CERQual project group. Website: https://www.cerqual.org/
Communicative Circuitry of the Green Shift (COGS)
(COGS) will follow the communication activities of three Norwegian research projects that focus on separate aspects of the so-called “green shift”. The project is lead by the Centre for Development and the Environment, University of Oslo. Website: https://www.sum.uio.no/english/research/projects/communicative-circuitry-of-the-green-shift/index.html
Fastlegens rolle for pasienter med depresjon.
Prosjektleder: Sabine Ruths NORCE/UiB. Samarbeidspartner fra HEMIL-senteret: Benedicte Carlsen
Prosjektet skal blant annet undersøke om helsehjelp til pasienter med depresjon varierer med kjønn og sosioøkonomisk status. I tillegg vil forskerne belyse sammenheng mellom pasientforløp og arbeidsdeltakelse. Opplysninger fra seks nasjonale helse- og velferdsregistre skal brukes til å følge alle voksne pasienter med en ny depresjonsdiagnose gjennom konsultasjoner, medikasjon, henvisninger, trygd og arbeidsdeltakelse. En annen del av prosjektet skal kartlegge hemmere og fremmere for at denne pasientgruppen skal kunne motta godt koordinerte helsetjenester gjennom fastlegeordningen. I denne delen av studien skal forskerne bruke fokusgrupper, intervjuer og en spørreundersøkelse blant norske fastleger.