Hjem
Mediebruksgruppen

Varselmelding

There has not been added a translated version of this content. You can either try searching or go to the "area" home page to see if you can find the information there
News use

News in crisis situations

New paper by Hallvard Moe, Torgeir Uberg Nærland and Brita Ytre-Arne discusses people’s news experiences before, during and after societal crisis situations.

Image of pandemic on screen
Foto/ill.:
Patrick Assalé, Unsplash.com

Hovedinnhold

In the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have seen a news picture filled with war, political and economic unrest, rising electricity and food prices, and climate-related disasters such as floods and earthquakes. New research from the media usage group shows that the way we read news about such crises can be said to follow a fairly predictable pattern in three phases; Ritual checking, shocked immersion and regained stability.

Research into news use around, among other things, Donald Trump's election victory in 2016 and the spread of COVID-19 shows that use often follows a pattern in stages. Ritual checking refers to the way most of us normally consume news: We check various news providers, scan websites and form a general picture of what is happening in the world. Phase two - shocked immersion - describes what happens when a crisis situation occurs. In this phase, you tend to spend a lot of time following news about this specific crisis, and typically experience it as important, frightening and/or all-consuming. In the last phase, we return to normality and stability.

The researchers underline the significance of emotional distancing to regain stability, and identify crises lacking start- and endpoints as particularly difficult to navigate. These insights should instigate further debate about our understanding of news audiences in a tumultuous world, particularly relevant to scholarship on news use and avoidance.