Home
Mathilde Bøttger Sørensen's picture

Mathilde Bøttger Sørensen

Professor
  • E-mailMathilde.Sorensen@uib.no
  • Phone+47 55 58 34 26
  • Visitor Address
    Realfagbygget, Allégaten 41
    Room 
    2A16f - 2118
  • Postal Address
    Postboks 7803
    5020 Bergen

GEOV111 - Introduction to Geophysics

GEOV217 - Geohazards

GEOV357 - Seismic Risk

Academic article
  • Show author(s) 2021. Testing the Environmental Seismic Intensity Scale on Data Derived from the Earthquakes of 1626, 1759, 1819, and 1904 in Fennoscandia, Northern Europe. Geosciences. 1-14.
  • Show author(s) 2020. Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment for the Shanxi Rift System, North China. Bulletin of The Seismological Society of America (BSSA).
  • Show author(s) 2020. Global quieting of high-frequency seismic noise due to COVID-19 pandemic lockdown measures. Science. 1338-1343.
  • Show author(s) 2020. Citizen Seismology in the Arctic. Frontiers in Earth Science.
  • Show author(s) 2020. A Reappraisal of the Lurøy, Norway, Earthquake of 31 August 1819. Seismological Research Letters. 2462-2472.
  • Show author(s) 2018. Seismotectonics of south-west Dominican Republic using recent data. Journal of Seismology. 883-896.
  • Show author(s) 2018. NE Atlantic continental slope stability from a numerical modeling perspective. Quaternary Science Reviews. 248-265.
  • Show author(s) 2016. Coda Q in different tectonic areas, influence of processing parameters. Bulletin of The Seismological Society of America (BSSA). 956-970.
  • Show author(s) 2015. The European plate observing system and the Arctic. Arctic. 1-7.
  • Show author(s) 2015. Regional stress field around the Taigu fault zone in Shanxi Province, China. Earthquake Science. 333-345.
  • Show author(s) 2015. Incorporating simulated ground motion in seismic risk assessment: Application to the lower Indian Himalayas. Earthquake spectra. 71-95.
  • Show author(s) 2015. Coulomb stress evolution in the Shanxi rift system, North China, since 1303 associated with coseismic, post-seismic and interseismic deformation. Geophysical Journal International. 1642-1664.
  • Show author(s) 2014. New magnitude scales M L and spectrum-based M w for the area around Shanxi Rift System, North China. Journal of Seismology. 141-158.
  • Show author(s) 2013. Norwegian seiches from the giant 2011 Tohoku earthquake. Geophysical Research Letters. 3374-3378.
  • Show author(s) 2013. Ground motion simulations for A degrees zmir, Turkey: parameter uncertainty. Journal of Seismology. 1223-1252.
  • Show author(s) 2012. Probabilistic tsunami hazard in the Mediterranean Sea. Journal of Geophysical Research (JGR): Solid Earth.
  • Show author(s) 2011. The seismotectonics of Western Skagerrak. Journal of Seismology. 599-611.
  • Show author(s) 2010. Strong Ground-Motion Simulation of the 12 May 2008 M-w 7.9 Wenchuan Earthquake, Using Various Slip Models. Bulletin of The Seismological Society of America (BSSA). 2396-2424.
  • Show author(s) 2010. Reconnaissance report and preliminary ground motion simulation of the 12 May 2008 Wenchuan earthquake. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. 1569-1601.
  • Show author(s) 2010. Intensity attenuation in the Campania region, Southern Italy. Journal of Seismology. 209-223.
  • Show author(s) 2010. Forecasting Italian seismicity through a spatio-temporal physical model: importance of considering time-dependency and reliability of the forecast. Annals of Geophysics. 129-140.
  • Show author(s) 2010. A macroseismic intensity prediction equation for intermediate depth earthquakes in the Vrancea region, Romania. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 1268-1278.
  • Show author(s) 2009. Attenuation of macroseismic intensity – a new relation for the Marmara Sea region, NW Turkey. Bulletin of The Seismological Society of America (BSSA). 538-553.
  • Show author(s) 2008. Continued earthquake hazard in Northern Sumatra. Eos. 139-140.
  • Show author(s) 2007. The detection and location of low magnitude earthquakes in northern Norway using multi-channel waveform correlation at regional distances. Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors. 285-309.
  • Show author(s) 2007. Tectonic processes in the Jan Mayen fracture zone based on earthquake occurrence and bathymetry. Bulletin of The Seismological Society of America (BSSA). 772-779.
  • Show author(s) 2007. Simulated strong ground motions for the Great M 9.3 Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake of 26 December 2004. Bulletin of The Seismological Society of America (BSSA). 139-151.
  • Show author(s) 2007. Sensitivity of ground-motion simulations to earthquake source parameters: A case study for Istanbul, Turkey. Bulletin of The Seismological Society of America (BSSA). 881-900.
  • Show author(s) 2006. Local site effects in Ataköy, Istanbul, Turkey, due to a future large earthquake in the Marmara Sea. Geophysical Journal International. 1413-1424.
  • Show author(s) 2006. Ground motion scaling in the Marmara region, Turkey. Geophysical Journal International. 635-651.
  • Show author(s) 1999. The effect of exercise and diet on mental health and quality of life in middle aged individuals with elevated risk factors for cardiovascular disease. Journal of Sports Sciences. 369-377.
  • Show author(s) 1999. Exercise and diet interventions improve perceptions of self in middle aged adults. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports. 312-320.
Report
  • Show author(s) 2019. Deliverable 2.10. Synthesis of gap analysis and exploitation of the existing Arctic observing systems. .
  • Show author(s) 2018. INTAROS Deliverable 2.2 Report on exploitation of existing data: ocean and sea ice data. .
  • Show author(s) 2006. Seismotectonics of the Sumatra-Andaman subduction zone: An analysis of the tsunamigenic earthquake potential for the coastal areas of Thailand. Project Report for the Project “Tsunami Risk Reduction Measures With focus on Land Use and Rehabilitation: Case studies carried out for Thailand, conceptual results applicable to all tsunami affected areas around the Indian Ocean and the Andaman Sea”. .
  • Show author(s) 2006. Potential of Vulnerability and Seismic Risk. Large earthquake faulting and implications for the seismic hazard assessment in Europe. RELIEF Project Deliverable No.27. .
  • Show author(s) 2006. Maps of Seismic Hazard Scenarios. Large earthquake faulting and implications for the seismic hazard assessment in Europe. RELIEF Project Deliverable No.25. .
  • Show author(s) 2006. Large earthquake faulting and implications for the seismic hazard assessment in Europe. RELIEF Project Deliverable No.28 (Third Year). .
  • Show author(s) 2006. Large earthquake faulting and implications for the seismic hazard assessment in Europe. RELIEF Project Annual Report (Third Year). .
  • Show author(s) 2006. Hazard Analysis and Uncertainties of Data. Large earthquake faulting and implications for the seismic hazard assessment in Europe. RELIEF Project Deliverable No.26. .
  • Show author(s) 2006. Final Report (Partner 6 – UiB). Large earthquake faulting and implications for the seismic hazard assessment in Europe. RELIEF Project. .
  • Show author(s) 2004. Strong motion analysis for site effects, map of sites. RELIEF Project Deliverable No. 17. .
  • Show author(s) 2004. Re-evaluation of seismic catalogue. RELIEF Project Deliverable No. 16. .
  • Show author(s) 2004. Large earthquake faulting and implications for the seismic hazard assessment in Europe. RELIEF Project Annual Report. .
  • Show author(s) 2004. Guidelines for the implementation of the H/V spectral ratio technique on ambient vibrations: measurements, processing and interpretation. .
  • Show author(s) 2004. Attenuation models and seismic hazard maps. RELIEF Project Deiverable No. 18. .
Popular scientific lecture
  • Show author(s) 2012. Jordskjelv og tsunamier i Norge - og resten av verden.
  • Show author(s) 2011. Tsunami hazard.
Academic lecture
  • Show author(s) 2014. Active faults and potential ground shaking in Cuba.
  • Show author(s) 2012. The seismic network of Ataturk University, Erzurum, and examples of use of data.
  • Show author(s) 2012. Norwegian fjords sang along – observations of seiches following the 2011 Tohoku, Japan, earthquake.
  • Show author(s) 2012. Norwegian fjords sang along – observations of seiches following the 2011 Tohoku, Japan, earthquake.
  • Show author(s) 2012. Method meets application: on the use of earthquake scenarios in disaster preparedness and response.
  • Show author(s) 2012. Implications of considering finite fault rupture properties in seismic hazard and risk assessment.
  • Show author(s) 2011. The Norwegian National Seismic Network and seismicity studies in Norway.
  • Show author(s) 2011. Simulation of earthquake ground motion – experience and possibilities.
  • Show author(s) 2011. Probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment in the Mediterranean Sea.
  • Show author(s) 2011. Paneldiskusjon: "Frauenquote - Quotenfrauen?".
  • Show author(s) 2011. Implications of considering finite fault rupture properties in seismic hazard and risk assessment.
  • Show author(s) 2011. Implications of considering finite fault rupture properties in seismic hazard and risk assessment.
  • Show author(s) 2010. Strong Ground Motion Simulation of the 12 May 2008 M 7.9 Wenchuan Earthquake, Using Various Slip Models.
  • Show author(s) 2010. Seismic Hazard and Risk in Norway – Past, Present and Future. Part 1: Seismic Hazard.
  • Show author(s) 2010. Probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment in the Mediterranean Sea.
  • Show author(s) 2010. Parameter sensitivity of ground motion simulations based on hybrid broadband calculations. A case study for İzmir, Turkey.
  • Show author(s) 2010. Deterministic seismic hazard assessment in Izmir, Turkey.
  • Show author(s) 2009. Wenchuan earthquake disaster of 12 May 2008 (M=8.0), China.
  • Show author(s) 2009. Continued earthquake hazard in Northern Sumatra: Ground shaking potential of future earthquakes.
  • Show author(s) 2008. Implications of strong ground motion complexity for seismic hazard assessment.
  • Show author(s) 2008. Ground motion simulations and parameter sensitivity – a case study for assessing seismic hazard in Izmir, Turkey.
  • Show author(s) 2008. Continued earthquake hazard in Northern Sumatra.
  • Show author(s) 2006. Simulated strong ground motions for the great Sumatra-Andaman earthquake of December 26, 2004.
  • Show author(s) 2006. Sensitivity of ground motion simulations to earthquake source parameters: a case study for Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Show author(s) 2006. Implications of fault behavior in the Marmara Sea on ground motion simulations and seismic hazard assessment.
  • Show author(s) 2006. Effects of earthquake source complexity in estimating seismic hazard: A case study for Istanbul.
  • Show author(s) 2006. Earthquake source complexity in the Marmara Sea and its influence on ground motion simulations.
  • Show author(s) 2006. Earthquake source complexity in the Marmara Sea and its influence in ground motion simulations.
  • Show author(s) 2005. Tectonic processes in the Jan Mayen Fracture Zone based on earthquake occurence and bathymetry.
  • Show author(s) 2005. Modelling of ground motions and stress transfer caused by the December 26, 2004 Sumatra earthquake.
  • Show author(s) 2005. Modeling of ground motions and stress transfer caused by the December 26, 2004 Sumatra earthquake.
  • Show author(s) 2005. Modeling of ground motions and stress transfer caused by the December 26, 2004 Sumatra earthquake.
  • Show author(s) 2005. Local site effects in Ataköy, Istanbul Turkey: empirical data vs. syntetics from hybrid modelling.
  • Show author(s) 2005. Local site effects in Atakoy, Istanbul Tyrkey: Empirical data vs. synthetics from hybrid modelling. Poster.
  • Show author(s) 2005. Ground motion simulations for a M=7,5 scenario earthqyake in the Marmara Sea and implications for the city of Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Show author(s) 2005. Ground motion simulations for a M=7,5 scenario earthquake in the Marmara Sea and implications for the city of Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Show author(s) 2005. Ground motion simulations for a M=7,5 scenario earthquake in Marmara Sea and implications for the city of Istanbul.
  • Show author(s) 2005. Ground motion simulations for Istanbul: a parameter sensitivity study.
  • Show author(s) 2005. Earthquake hazard in Istanbul: synthesis and implications for the end-users.
  • Show author(s) 2005. Earthquake hazard in Istanbul: general overview.
  • Show author(s) 2004. The H/V spectral ratio technique: experimental conditions, data processing and empirical reliability assessment.
  • Show author(s) 2004. The April 14, 2004 Jan Mayen earthquake.
  • Show author(s) 2004. Practical user guidelines and software for the implementation of the H/V ratio technique: measuring conditions, processing method and results interpretation.
  • Show author(s) 2004. On the Reliability of the H/V Spectral Ratio Technique.
  • Show author(s) 2004. Local site effects and noise characteristics in Ataköy area, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Show author(s) 2004. Influence of experimental condition for �H/V� on ambient noise vibration method.
  • Show author(s) 2004. Influence of Experimental Conditions on H/V Determination Using Ambient Vibrations (Noise).
  • Show author(s) 2004. Ground motion simulations at rapid response sites in Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Show author(s) 2004. Ground motion simulations and site effect estimation for Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Show author(s) 2004. Empirical evaluation of the horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratio technique: results from the �SESAME� project.
Doctoral dissertation
  • Show author(s) 2015. Seismotectonics and seismic hazard of the Shanxi Rift System, North China.
  • Show author(s) 2006. Challenges in seismic hazard assessment – Analyses of ground motion modelling and seismotectonic sources.
Poster
  • Show author(s) 2020. HE34A-1990 Enhancement of ocean and sea ice insitu observations in the Arctic under the Horizon 2020 project INTAROS.
  • Show author(s) 2011. Method meets application: on the use of earthquake scenarios in community-based disaster preparedness and response.
  • Show author(s) 2011. Implications of considering finite fault rupture properties in seismic hazard and risk assessment.
  • Show author(s) 2011. Earthquake swarms in northern Norway.
  • Show author(s) 2010. The use of probabilistic tsunami hazard assessment in early warning system design.
  • Show author(s) 2010. Parameter sensitivity of ground motion simulations based on hybrid broadband calculations. A case study for İzmir, Turkey.
  • Show author(s) 2008. Seismotectonics of Skagerrak.
  • Show author(s) 2008. Continued earthquake hazard in Northern Sumatra: Ground shaking potential of a future earthquake.
  • Show author(s) 2006. ”benchmarking” exercise on the per-formance of kinematic ground motion simulation codes.
  • Show author(s) 2006. Simulated strong ground motions for the great M9.3 Sumatra-Adnaman earthquake of december 26,2004.
  • Show author(s) 2006. Seismotectonics of Skagerrak.
  • Show author(s) 2006. Seismic hazard in Istanbul, Turkey, based on ground motion simu-lations, and uncertainties in the predicted ground motion levels.
  • Show author(s) 2006. Earthquake source complexity in the Marmara sea and its influence on ground motion simulations.
  • Show author(s) 2004. The April 14, 2004 Jan Mayen Earthquake.
  • Show author(s) 2004. J-SESAME: A standardized software solution for the H/V spectral ratio technique.
  • Show author(s) 2004. 3D Hybrid modelling of local site effects in Ataköy area, Istanbul, Turkey, due to finite-extent earthquake source.
  • Show author(s) 2004. 3D Hybrid modelling of local site effects in Ataköy area, Istanbul, Turkey, due to finite-extent earthquake source.
Academic literature review
  • Show author(s) 2021. Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard and Risk Analysis: A Review of Research Gaps. Frontiers in Earth Science.
  • Show author(s) 2017. Probabilistic Tsunami Hazard Analysis (PTHA): multiple sources and global applications. Reviews of Geophysics. 1158-1198.

More information in national current research information system (CRIStin)

Research groups