MANIFEST
MANIFEST maps the future for feasible climate action and explores our understanding of whether and under what conditions it is feasible to avoid dangerous climate change.
![solar panels and wind turbinds](https://www.uib.no/sites/w3.uib.no/files/styles/content_main/public/media/colourbox16061148.jpg?itok=i35L7pGb×tamp=1652958437)
Main content
MechANisms and actors of Feasible Energy Transitions (MANIFEST). Decarbonising the electricity system requires technologies that are already commercially available. They can be deployed fast enough and at a large enough scale to displace fossil fuels and meet climate targets. Still, there is no scientific method to evaluate whether these scenarios are feasible, given various real-world sociopolitical constraints. The EU-funded MANIFEST project is developing a new scientific understanding of the sociopolitical feasibility of climate change mitigation that takes into account the context, actors and changes over time. The project's work will provide a dynamic framework through which to assess the feasibility of national and global climate change mitigation solutions, thus accelerating their take-up.
The technologies needed to decarbonize the electricity system are already commercially available. There are mathematical models of how these technologies can be deployed sufficiently fast and at a large enough scale to displace fossil fuels to meet climate targets. Yet there is no scientific method to evaluate whether these scenarios are feasible given the real world’s socio-political constraints. MANIFEST develops a new scientific understanding of socio-political feasibility of climate change mitigation that takes into account the context, actors and change over time. Theoretically, MANIFEST combines a definition of socio-political feasibility from political philosophy with the concept of causal mechanisms of energy transitions. Thus, I shift the thinking about the feasibility of climate change mitigation from its current focus on barriers and enablers to a dynamic and context sensitive view with space for actors and agency. Empirically, I focus on transitions in electricity supply including the expansion of low-carbon electricity and coal phase-out.
Outcomes
I explore three areas that are critical for the feasibility of decarbonisation of electricity:
- The role and capacities of international suppliers of electricity technologies,
- The competition between electricity technologies at the early stages of their introduction in emerging economies, and
- Factors shaping the growth of low-carbon technologies and under what conditions they substitute carbon-intensive ones.
Methodologically, I develop a new approach to assess the feasibility of climate solutions by constructing dynamic feasibility spaces which are a function of paths, contexts and actors. I test this approach by analysing national low-carbon electricity targets to determine whether states plan to accelerate decarbonisation beyond the current feasibility frontier. This dynamic feasibility space is a breakthrough in assessing the feasibility of national and global climate change mitigation solutions.
Publications
A. Cherp, V. Vinichenko, J. Tosun, J. Gordon & J. Jewell. (2021). National growth dynamics of wind and solar power compared to the growth required for global climate targets. Nature Energy. Gated. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00863-0. Free SharedIt link (view only) code on GitHub: https://github.com/poletresearch/RES_article.
M. Hyun, A. Cherp, J. Jewell, Y. J. Kim & J. Eom. (2021). Feasibility trade-offs in decarbonisation of power sector with high coal dependence: A case of Korea. In Review. Preprint.