Home
Centre for Sustainable Area Management (CeSAM)
Nature Deal

Support for the scientists' appeal for the nature deal

We have received over 750 signatures to our appeal «Stortinget må sette kunnskapen i arbeid for å stoppe naturtapet» (Norwegian government must use knowledge-based solutions to stop the loss of nature), and many supportive messages in the commentary section.

forskeropprop
Photo:
opprop.net

Main content

 

The comments on the petition clearly bear the hallmark of a strong commitment to nature, with a desire for the authorities to act quickly and effectively. Here is an overview of the most common arguments, categorized into 7 main themes:

1. Lack of action by the authorities

Many express frustration that political measures and action plans are vague, not very specific or insufficient to stop the loss of Norwegian nature and biodiversity. For example, it is pointed out that the government does not take the nature crisis seriously or follows up on international agreements such as the Nature Convention.

2. Nature's intrinsic value and the importance for human life and health

Many highlight nature's intrinsic value and its indispensable role for human health, well-being and the basis for existence in the future. Arguments such as that destruction of nature and its "reduced health status" in ecosystems also threaten human health and existence are common.

3. Knowledge-based management

Several of those signing criticize that available research and scientific advice are not used to inform political decisions. They call for measures that are based on available research and knowledge about the consequences for nature and society.

4. Demand for concrete measures

There is a consistent demand to formulate specific, measurable and time-bound actions to slow down the loss of nature. This includes measures such as the restoration of damaged nature, the establishment of protected areas and stricter laws and regulations that prioritize nature considerations.

5. Criticism of economic priorities

Many express dissatisfaction with the fact that short-term economic growth and development are prioritized over the sustainable use and conservation of nature. This includes criticism of development projects such as wind farms and infrastructure development that come at the expense of large (and in some cases untouched) natural areas.

6. Responsibility for future generations

Many of those who have signed feel a great responsibility for future generations. They want to preserve nature both as a resource and a value for children and grandchildren.

7. Global and national obligations

It is pointed out that Norway, as a resource-rich nation, has a special responsibility to act both nationally and internationally. They refer to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Paris Agreement and other international obligations.